There's something about luxury which makes you question its very existence. Wasn't it meant to be for a select few and if it is accessible to all - then is it really a luxury after all?
My friend tells me she won't take a chance travelling in a train, for the last time she did so - she booked executive class - and ended up sitting next to a maid...
Comments
now you speak asif a maid is some kinda alien low caste thingy. But I tell you, I've been like on everything, and the train iz theeeeeee best. Planesz r so damn borin, and u like just sit and stay quiet till it ends. Trainz r different. And I like the view. And ferry rides always make me sick. This is like so off-topic. But yea luxury is accessible to all, and to the worst of ppl if u ask me. So it really iznt luxury I guess. That's how the next person wants to potray it as. Nyways, now even I'm done with like my homework n stuff. And doin nothing. So itz the 2 ov us then. 'Monotomy' or not... ;)
made cooler by Rohit on May 6, 2004 5:13 PM
I don't know about Delhi, but in Bombay it's only the very, very spoiled who won't travel by train.
made cooler by Vishalpatel on May 7, 2004 4:19 AM
hmm.. well, if someone can afforb the luxury.. like u written abt the maid.. then I dont have any objection on it.. coz everyone got euqal rights its not like a low cast or something like that.. afterall everyone is same.. so I dont mind if one begger come near by me and seat besides me in bus or train or airplane or whatever place.
made cooler by Dhaval Faria on May 7, 2004 2:56 PM
ya but like Vishalpatel said.. about the Mumbai local trains.. lol.. thats crazy stuff..
made cooler by Dhaval Faria on May 7, 2004 2:57 PM
Well, it depends upon how you define luxury? Money? or Personal Satisfaction? Coz it would b a luxury for a labourer to b able to afford a fan, while the latest of the AC's might not b a luxury for some, and sitting right next to a maid, only shows that "Our India is really Shining :D"
made cooler by Sarthak on May 8, 2004 3:31 PM